Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
> > #max_fsm_pages = 1600000 # min max_fsm_relations*16, 6 bytes each
>
> max_fsm_pages doesn't have a discernible unit
Yes, max_fsm_*pages* doesn't have a unit, but can we treat the value as
"the amount of trackable database size by fsm" or "estimated database size" ?
(the latter is a bit too radical interpretation, though.)
So I think it is not so odd to give a unit to max_fsm_pages.
Regards,
---
ITAGAKI Takahiro
NTT Open Source Software Center
