Re: why not kill -9 postmaster - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: why not kill -9 postmaster
Date
Msg-id 20061020132954.GD27869@alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: why not kill -9 postmaster  (Shane Ambler <pgsql@007Marketing.com>)
Responses Re: why not kill -9 postmaster
Re: why not kill -9 postmaster
List pgsql-general
Shane Ambler wrote:

> The one thing worse than kill -9 the postmaster is pulling the power
> cord out of the server. Which is what makes UPS's so good.
>
> If your server is changing the data file on disk and you pull the power
> cord, what chance do you expect of reading that data file again?

1.  That's what we have WAL for.  The only thing that can really kill
you is the use of non-battery-backed write cache.

--
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Shane Ambler
Date:
Subject: Re: why not kill -9 postmaster
Next
From: Andreas Seltenreich
Date:
Subject: Re: c function returning high resolution timestamp