Chris Browne wrote:
> Would the following 'maintenance' regimen be truly safe against XID
> wraparound:
>
> - Most tables are being vacuumed regularly, so that
> pg_class.relfrozenxid is kept "safe."
>
> - There are some tables that periodically get TRUNCATEd so that, in
> principle, they never need to be vacuumed.
>
> Is it actually true that we'd never need to vacuum those tables
> (assuming 8.2+)? I suppose it would be rather cheap to VACUUM
> immediately after the TRUNCATE...
You'd need to vacuum after the truncate. It would be pretty cheap, the
tables being empty.
I suppose it would be pretty trivial to set the relfrozenxid to
RecentXmin or something during TRUNCATE.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
