Re: 8.3 pending patch queue - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Subject | Re: 8.3 pending patch queue |
Date | |
Msg-id | 200705152250.l4FMoAU20887@momjian.us Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: 8.3 pending patch queue ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Responses |
Re: 8.3 pending patch queue
|
List | pgsql-hackers |
Joshua D. Drake wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > If people want proof that we have had some patches for months, this > > email is from Simon from January, 2007. > > > > I don't think anyone (at least sanely) questions that there are patches > hanging out there. My point is that pushing them for 8.4 effectively doesn't move us forward because we have been "pushing" for a while. And you can't blame tracking because everyone knows what has to happen. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Joshua D. Drake > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Simon Riggs wrote: > >> On Mon, 2007-01-01 at 19:04 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > >> > >>> I will start processing the patches held for 8.3 this week or next, now > >>> that the holiday break is over: > >>> > >>> http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches_hold > >>> > >> The following patches don't appear on this list: > >> > >> Concurrent psql > >> Original submission > >> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2006-08/msg00249.php > >> Latest > >> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-12/msg00527.php > >> Described here: http://community.enterprisedb.com/concurrent/index.html > >> > >> WAL Index Split > >> Original submission > >> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2006-12/msg00045.php > >> Latest > >> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2007-01/msg00000.php > >> > >> Grouped Items > >> Latest > >> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2006-11/msg00051.php > >> Described here: http://community.enterprisedb.com/git/index.html > >> > >> Maintain Cluster Order > >> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2006-08/msg00124.php > >> > >> All have been awaiting review for at least a month (though in one case > >> the latest version is quite recent). They probably ought to be on the > >> hold queue; all are ready to be reviewed for final > >> application/rejection. > >> > >> I'd hasten to add that none of those are mine. My patches have received > >> good attention, so I'm not complaining just completing admin. > >> > >> -- > >> Simon Riggs > >> EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com > >> > >> > >> > >> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > >> TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? > >> > >> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq > > > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
pgsql-hackers by date: