Re: pgpool2 vs sequoia - Mailing list pgsql-general

From David Fetter
Subject Re: pgpool2 vs sequoia
Date
Msg-id 20070803154948.GR17022@fetter.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pgpool2 vs sequoia  (mljv@planwerk6.de)
Responses Re: pgpool2 vs sequoia
Re: pgpool2 vs sequoia
List pgsql-general
On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 09:25:41AM +0200, mljv@planwerk6.de wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 2. August 2007 22:37 schrieben Sie:
> > On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 11:58:40AM +0200, mljv@planwerk6.de wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > i would like to use a statement replication for postgresql
> >
> > Why?
>
> i have read
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.2/interactive/high-availability.html
>
> i want 4 synchronous databases with load balancing, so my
> application has high performance and high availability.

Very few people actually need synchronous replication, and those who
do buy Oracle's RAC (and curse it) or use DB2's offering (and also
curse it ;).  For most purposes, fast asynchronous replication is good
enough.

Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 415 235 3778        AIM: dfetter666
                              Skype: davidfetter

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to PostgreSQL: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: index bloat WAS: reindexing pg_shdepend
Next
From: "Sibte Abbas"
Date:
Subject: Re: parsed queries (cursors) cashing issues