Re: [Again] Postgres performance problem - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Decibel!
Subject Re: [Again] Postgres performance problem
Date
Msg-id 20070917122735.GK16759@decibel.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [Again] Postgres performance problem  (Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>)
Responses [OT] Re: [Again] Postgres performance problem
List pgsql-performance
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 01:58:10AM -0400, Greg Smith wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Sep 2007, Scott Marlowe wrote:
>
> >I'm getting more and more motivated to rewrite the vacuum docs.  I think
> >a rewrite from the ground up might be best...  I keep seeing people
> >doing vacuum full on this list and I'm thinking it's as much because of
> >the way the docs represent vacuum full as anything.
>
> I agree you shouldn't start thinking in terms of how to fix the existing
> documentation.  I'd suggest instead writing a tutorial leading someone
> through what they need to know about their tables first and then going
> into how vacuum works based on that data.

Take a look at the stuff at http://decibel.org/~decibel/pervasive/, it'd
hopefully provide a useful starting point.
--
Decibel!, aka Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect  decibel@decibel.org
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828

Attachment

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: Index usage when bitwise operator is used
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Index usage when bitwise operator is used