Re: more problems with count(*) on large table - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: more problems with count(*) on large table
Date
Msg-id 20070928165034.GG18001@alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: more problems with count(*) on large table  ("A. Kretschmer" <andreas.kretschmer@schollglas.com>)
Responses Re: more problems with count(*) on large table
Re: more problems with count(*) on large table
Re: more problems with count(*) on large table
List pgsql-general
A. Kretschmer wrote:
> am  Fri, dem 28.09.2007, um 11:56:46 -0400 mailte Mike Charnoky folgendes:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am still having problems performing a count(*) on a large table.  This
> >
> > Now, certain count(*) queries are failing to complete for certain time
> > ranges (I killed the query after about 24 hours).  The table is indexed
> > on a timestamp field.  Here is one query that hangs:
>
> Again: an index can't help! Because of MVCC: 'select count(*)' without
> WHERE-condition forces an seq. table-scan.

But he does have a WHERE condition.  THe problem is, probably, that the
condition is not selective enough so the planner chooses to do a
seqscan.

--
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "A. Kretschmer"
Date:
Subject: Re: more problems with count(*) on large table
Next
From: Nico Sabbi
Date:
Subject: Re: row->ARRAY or row->table casting?