Re: lists topic change - Mailing list pgsql-www
From | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Subject | Re: lists topic change |
Date | |
Msg-id | 20071120134927.09c56986@commandprompt.com Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: lists topic change (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Responses |
Re: lists topic change
|
List | pgsql-www |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 20 Nov 2007 21:38:48 +0000 Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On Tue, 2007-11-20 at 12:55 -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > > > After recent discussion on pgsql-eu it is obvious the description is > > not valid. I only did it for -eu-general because I assume the other > > communities would want to also make their own definition of what > > their lists are for. > > Josh, the description is perfectly valid already. Obviously I disagree. I was confused by what very little non descriptive description it has. I was trying to make it clearer for people. > > You were asked not to post to an EU list about a non-EU topic by two > people, with nobody supporting your position. > What in gods name are you talking about? I wasn't pushing a "position" something that in your blind stubbornness you have yet to figure out. I was trying to understand the scope of the list which *is not documented anywhere* > If I insisted on posting in English to the Spanish list, I would > imagine a similar reaction, though out of respect I would not push to > see if that was the case. Somehow you have made absolutely zero sense in this sentence. I didn't post English to a Spanish list. I posted about a community conference to a community list. I now realize that the community list in question (eu-general) exists to talk about specific European issues. I did not know that before as it is *NOT DOCUMENTED ANYWHERE*. I thought, it was just like pgsql-general except that it was centered around the European geographical area. It has since been pointed out to me that I was incorrect in my assumption which is fine but I felt that it should be documented so others don't make the same mistake. I have zero idea why you have gotten all upset about this. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake - -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/ UNIQUE NOT NULL Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHQ1ZnATb/zqfZUUQRAtjoAJ9IiUFL3fI2rpmrZnE3fVRlkdM8kwCfT4Tn zT9XFe//sE/HXTG7Noc5zZ8= =inn1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----