Re: Permanent settings - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Subject | Re: Permanent settings |
Date | |
Msg-id | 200802192305.m1JN5fB24502@momjian.us Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: Permanent settings (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Responses |
Re: Permanent settings
|
List | pgsql-hackers |
One idea would be to remove duplicate postgresql.conf appended entries on server start. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Josh Berkus wrote: > Magnus, > > > That's basically "include" but with a different name, no? > > Yes. FWIW, I seem to be lagged about 3 hours on -hackers. > > > Why do you need to split it in two columns, and what would go in what > > column? > > Current data: > > postgres=# select name, category from pg_settings; > name | category > -------------------------+------------------------------------------------------------------- > allow_system_table_mods | Developer Options > archive_command | Write-Ahead Log / Settings > archive_mode | Write-Ahead Log / Settings > archive_timeout | Write-Ahead Log / Settings > > How it should be: > > postgres=# select name, category, subcategory from pg_settings; > name | category | subcategory > -------------------------+------------------------------------------------ > allow_system_table_mods | Developer Options | > archive_command | Write-Ahead Log | Settings > archive_mode | Write-Ahead Log | Settings > archive_timeout | Write-Ahead Log | Settings > > this would then allow us to do this: > > select * from pg_settings_categories > name order > Developer Options 37 > Write-Ahead Log 11 > > select * from pg_settings_subcategories > name category > allow_system_table_mods Developer Options > archive_command Write-Ahead Log > archive_mode Write-Ahead Log > > and then generate a file which looks like this: > > # == Write-Ahead Log == > # Settings > > archive_command = '/bin/rsync' > archive_mode = 'on' > > # Fsync > > fsync = on > wal_buffers = 8mb > > ... etc. > > This would allow the automatically generated version to be readable and > searchable, if not quite as narrative as the present postgresql.conf. > > > > > > > 3) have command line config write to postgresql.auto.conf, dumping the > > > whole of pg_settings organized with headings in categories order. > > > > Don't get what you mean here. You mean you want a commandline tool to > > generate a config file from pg_settings? > > I meant from the SQL command line. > > > Another question completely, but related, is if it's actually the right > > thing to use postgresql.conf to write documentation. The way it is now > > we basically add all new config options to postgresql.conf.sample along > > with a comment that is the documentation. A different approach would be > > to only include the very most common settings, or possibly even only > > those that initdb sets to something non-default, in > > postgresql.conf.sample, and have the rest only added when they're > > actually used. Documentation really belongs in the documentation, after > > all... > > Yeah, we've taken an Apache-like approach of including heavy comments on > the settings in the settings file itself. Unfortunately, I think changing > that practice at this point would alienate a bunch of users. > > -- > --Josh > > Josh Berkus > PostgreSQL @ Sun > San Francisco > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate > subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
pgsql-hackers by date: