Re: Including PL/PgSQL by default - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Including PL/PgSQL by default
Date
Msg-id 200802221053.14357.peter_e@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Including PL/PgSQL by default  ("Dave Page" <dpage@pgadmin.org>)
Responses Re: Including PL/PgSQL by default
List pgsql-hackers
Am Freitag, 22. Februar 2008 schrieb Dave Page:
> I know I'm gonna regret wading in on this, but in my mind this is akin
> to one of the arguments for including tsearch in the core server -
> namely that too many brain dead hosting providers won't add a contrib
> module or anything else in a customer's database because they don't
> understand that just because it's not there by default doesn't mean
> it's in any way second rate. Including pl/pgsql in template1 will help
> those folks who forwhatever reason use such providers, whilst more
> savvy providers can easily disable it post-initdb if thats what they
> want to do.

Half of this entire thread is content-free because the participants are 
apparently not aware that a database owner can add plpgsql *without* 
superuser privileges.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Dave Page"
Date:
Subject: Re: Linking backend in one piece
Next
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: Including PL/PgSQL by default