Re: Scripting function definitions as SQL? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From hubert depesz lubaczewski
Subject Re: Scripting function definitions as SQL?
Date
Msg-id 20080511184325.GA30844@depesz.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Scripting function definitions as SQL?  ("Postgres User" <postgres.developer@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Scripting function definitions as SQL?
List pgsql-general
On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 11:28:37AM -0700, Postgres User wrote:
> Unfortunately I didn't see a way to tell pg_dump to dump only objects
> of a specific type, like functions or sequences.  It requires
> additional coding to parse the output and that's less than ideal...

hmmm .. "additional coding" seems a bit too much for a simple thing like
this:
pg_dump -s | perl -ne 'print if /^CREATE FUNCTION test_it/../^\s+LANGUAGE/'

of course it would be cool to have switch to do it, but hey - it hardly
even qualifies as one-liner. it's more "an expression" than code.

depesz

--
quicksil1er: "postgres is excellent, but like any DB it requires a
highly paid DBA.  here's my CV!" :)
http://www.depesz.com/ - blog dla ciebie (i moje CV)

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Chuck Bai
Date:
Subject: How to create a function with multiple RefCursor OUT parameters
Next
From: "Postgres User"
Date:
Subject: Re: Scripting function definitions as SQL?