Re: Postgres mail list traffic over time - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Postgres mail list traffic over time
Date
Msg-id 200811210406.mAL46wC14277@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Postgres mail list traffic over time  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Postgres mail list traffic over time
List pgsql-general
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> So, to a first approximation, the PG list traffic has been constant
> >> since 2000.  Not the result I expected.
>
> > I also was confused by its flatness.  I am finding the email traffic
> > almost impossible to continue tracking, so something different is
> > happening, but it seems it is not volume-related.
>
> Yes, my perception also is that it's getting harder and harder to keep
> up with the list traffic; so something is happening that a simple
> volume count doesn't capture.

Agreed.  I am struggling to put into words some of my angst, but I am
concerned I will not be able to offer the same guarantees I have done in
previous releases that every bug has been either fixed or added to the
TODO list, and every submitted patch has been either applied or rejected.

There, I said it.  :-(

--
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgres mail list traffic over time
Next
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgres mail list traffic over time