On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 04:11:11PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> David Fetter <david@fetter.org> writes:
> > On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 09:06:13PM +0100, Zdenek Kotala wrote:
> >> I takes 2.6 second on my laptop. I think it is not so bad.
>
> > About 2.0 on my OS/X laptop. Could this be a problem on whatever
> > architecture/OS/compiler combo you have?
>
> Not everyone is using fast new laptops.
Possibly not, but this could be a way to flush out inconsistencies
among floating point units or, more importantly, implementations of
NUMERIC.
> This is a cool hack, agreed, but that doesn't make it a useful
> regression test. Whatever value it might have isn't going to repay
> the community-wide expenditure of cycles.
What's the slowest it runs?
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
