Re: Bad news approval - Mailing list pgsql-www

From Robert Treat
Subject Re: Bad news approval
Date
Msg-id 200903171429.04204.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Bad news approval  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Responses Re: Bad news approval
List pgsql-www
On Tuesday 17 March 2009 12:03:31 Josh Berkus wrote:
> Robert,
>
> > That was my bad. For some reason I thought we had an exception for
> > products that are introducing PostgreSQL support into thier products. I
> > guess that isn't the case?
>
> Yeah, but not betas.  Look at it this way; if we're only allowing them one
> announcement per 6 months, then their final release will get no
> announcement.

Well, this assumes the final release is within 6 months of the beta 
announcement, which is probably true, though GMail is still in beta. I guess 
assuming a priori knowledge of the product release cycle should be done in 
favor of increasing the beta pool to help ensure solid support upon release. 
Thanks for the clarification.  :-)

-- 
Robert Treat
Conjecture: http://www.xzilla.net
Consulting: http://www.omniti.com


pgsql-www by date:

Previous
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: List Message Footer
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Bad news approval