Tom Lane wrote:
> I actually was expecting the above example to show me the user function,
> which I was then going to rant about being a lie. But the actual
> behavior is even worse than that.
>
> There is not anything that is not broken about HEAD's behavior,
> and the sooner we admit that the sooner we can get to a fix.
> Slicing the categorization more finely or in different ways is
> not going to improve matters: the concept that there is a categorization
> that will make it hide requested objects is wrong to begin with.
You can say it is broken, but what is your proposal?
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
