On Tue, 23 Jun 2009, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>> On Tue, 16 Jun 2009, Dave Page wrote:
>>
>>>> Ultimately it seems the failure to fix this problem is just because
>>>> Marc is the only one able to do it, and he's not around enough.
>>>
>>> No, the real problem is having our mail infrastructure tied into
>>> hub.org as a number of us have said before.
>>
>> Now that I have those two new servers in place, if someone wants to
>> setup spamassassin on that VPS itself to run instead of going through
>> the global spamassassin daemon, I'm cool with that ... I haven't moved
>> mail over to the new servers yet, but that just takes 15-20 minutes of
>> downtime to make happen ... could do that tomorrow evening ...
>
> Just to be absolutely clear on what you're saying here.
>
> Are you saying that you are now OK with de-coupling the postgresql.org
> mail from hub.org making it a community managed service?
>
> Or are you saying that you're ok with running a *second* instance of
> spamassassin, and still keep mail going through hub.org relays?
I'm okay with a dedicated instance of spamassassin running in
mail.postgresql.org so that it can be more tailored / configured to mark
spam going through to the moderators ...
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
