Re: Calling conventions - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Calling conventions
Date
Msg-id 200907171832.13082.peter_e@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Calling conventions  (Matthew Wakeling <matthew@flymine.org>)
Responses Re: Calling conventions
Re: Calling conventions
List pgsql-performance
On Friday 17 July 2009 16:40:40 Matthew Wakeling wrote:
> I'm considering rewriting a postgres extension (GiST index bioseg) to make
> it use version 1 calling conventions rather than version 0.
>
> Does anyone have any ideas/opinions/statistics on what the performance
> difference is between the two calling conventions?

Version 1 is technically slower if you count the number of instructions, but
considering that everyone else, including PostgreSQL itself, uses version 1,
and version 0 has been deprecated for years and will break on some
architectures, it should be a no-brainer.

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: cluster index on a table
Next
From: Matthew Wakeling
Date:
Subject: Re: Calling conventions