Re: Question about gettext licensing - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From David Fetter
Subject Re: Question about gettext licensing
Date
Msg-id 20090805153940.GE28595@fetter.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Question about gettext licensing  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-advocacy
On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 10:56:47AM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On Tuesday 04 August 2009 01:35:36 Vikram Patil wrote:
> > I was concerned about gettext licensing. I was able to build
> > PostgreSql with gettext library.  But this project is distributed
> > under GNU license.
> >
> > So I would like to know if we want to distribute product
> > commercially under different licenses, will it be okay ?  If not
> > then what approach usually companies, which distribute PostgreSql
> > as database, follow?
>
> The gettext package contains the processing tools, but the run-time
> support is in your C library.  So this is not different from
> compiling with GCC while the run-time support is again in the C
> library.

The library you really need to think about is libreadline, which is
GPL, so if you ship a psql binary using it, your psql is also GPL.
This may or may not concern you.

If it does concern you, one alternative is to compile psql against
libedit.  Another is not include readline support in it at all.

Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778  AIM: dfetter666  Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter      XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Question about gettext licensing
Next
From: "Vikram Patil"
Date:
Subject: Re: Question about gettext licensing