Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> It was written and submitted by one person who did not bother to ask
> first whether anyone else thought it was worthwhile. So its presence
> on the CF list should not be taken as evidence that there's consensus
> for it.
Should we have "Needs Discussion" phase before "Needs Review" ?
Reviews, including me, think patches with needs-review status are
worthwhile. In contrast, contributers often register their patches
to CF without discussions just because of no response; they cannot
find whether no response is silent approval or not.
Regards,
---
ITAGAKI Takahiro
NTT Open Source Software Center
