On Monday 28 December 2009 22:39:06 Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Le 28 déc. 2009 à 21:33, Kevin Grittner a écrit :
> > We often see posts from people who have more active connections than
> > is efficient.
>
> How would your proposal better solve the problem than using pgbouncer?
>
> <mad proposal time>
> I'd be in favor of considering how to get pgbouncer into -core, and now
> that we have Hot Standby maybe implement a mode in which as soon as a
> "real" XID is needed, or maybe upon receiving start transaction read write
> command, the connection is handled transparently to the master. </>
Thats not as easy as it sounds - the master may not have all data needed by
the snapshot on the slave anymore.
Andres
