Re: damage control mode - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From | David Fetter |
---|---|
Subject | Re: damage control mode |
Date | |
Msg-id | 20100108020913.GN30864@fetter.org Whole thread Raw |
In response to | damage control mode (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Responses |
Re: damage control mode
Re: damage control mode |
List | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 08:57:15PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote: > On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 4:23 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > >> On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 3:36 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > >>> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > >>>> I am tempted to say we should clamp down and go into damage control > >>>> mode sooner rather than later. > >>> > >>> The more I see of the HS patch, the more I think the same. But my > >>> proposal for "damage control mode" would be to immediately punt > >>> everything else to the next release and focus our energies exclusively > >>> on HS *and* SR. > > > >> Hmm. There's something to what you say, but what about the people who > >> were expecting their patches to be reviewed and perhaps committed in > >> the forthcoming CommitFest. I proposed a schedule for this release > >> that involved only three CommitFests and it was rejected, so it seems > >> a bit unfair to pull the rug out from under people at the eleventh > >> hour. Will we lose developers if we do this? > > > > Well, I think we should put at least some effort into clearing out > > the underbrush. There's a lot of pretty small stuff in the January CF > > list that I think we could go through in a short time. The biggies, > > IMO, are the ones you noted: > > > >> Unfortunately, there are some patches that I probably will not feel > >> confident to commit without your input - in particular, writeable > >> CTEs, listen/notify, more frame options in window functions - > > > > and Teodor's GIN/GIST stuff. If we feel that we are in schedule > > trouble I think that bumping these to the next release is by far > > the sanest response. Bumping SR so we can get these in would be > > completely misguided. > > OK, we have a proposal on the table to bump some patches from this > CommitFest to free up more committer resources, particularly Tom, to > work on Hot Standby and Streaming Replication and attempt to > accelerate the process of getting 8.5 out the door. This proposal > needs input from the community. The affected patches are: I don't see any need to thump the panic button today. If we *must* have SR and it's not in by the 15th, let's do another Commitfest rather than jack the people who played by the rules. Cheers, David. -- David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
pgsql-hackers by date: