Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings
Date
Msg-id 20100203183613.GE3905@alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:

> The argument for doing this now hinges solely on a marketing-driven
> choice of version name, and not on any actual evidence that applications
> are ready for it.  We really need to do this at the start of a devel
> and alpha test cycle, not at the end.

Application writers probably didn't bother all that much with alphas
though.  The bulk of them is going to start with the betas, which have
not been delivered yet, so it seems a good time to try.

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Recent vendor SSL renegotiation patches break PostgreSQL
Next
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings