Re: How filesystems matter with PostgreSQL - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: How filesystems matter with PostgreSQL
Date
Msg-id 201006041504.03218.andres@anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to How filesystems matter with PostgreSQL  (Jon Schewe <jpschewe@mtu.net>)
Responses Re: How filesystems matter with PostgreSQL
List pgsql-performance
On Friday 04 June 2010 14:17:35 Jon Schewe wrote:
> Some interesting data about different filesystems I tried with
> PostgreSQL and how it came out.
>
> I have an application that is backed in postgres using Java JDBC to
> access it. The tests were all done on an opensuse 11.2 64-bit machine,
> on the same hard drive (just ran mkfs between each test) on the same
> input with the same code base. All filesystems were created with the
> default options.
>
> XFS (logbufs=8): ~4 hours to finish
> ext4: ~1 hour 50 minutes to finish
> ext3: 15 minutes to finish
> ext3 on LVM: 15 minutes to finish
My guess is that some of the difference comes from barrier differences. ext4
uses barriers by default, ext3 does not.

Andres

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "J. Roeleveld"
Date:
Subject: Re: How filesystems matter with PostgreSQL
Next
From: Marc Cousin
Date:
Subject: performance regression with Linux 2.6.33 and glibc 2.12