On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 04:16:13PM +0100, Thom Brown wrote:
> On 21 June 2010 16:12, David Fetter <david@fetter.org> wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 01:34:37PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> >> On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 02:42, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote:
> >> > On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 17:22 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> >> >> > "The PostgreSQL Global Development Team is proud to announce
> >> >> > the release of version 9.0. "
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Maybe "PostgreSQL 9.0" instead of "version 9.0"?
> >> >>
> >> >> Yeah, tried that too, it seemed repetitive. You don't think so?
> >> >
> >> > O.k. this may not fly but:
> >> >
> >> > The PostgreSQL Global Development Group (that is who we are, not
> >> > team) is proud to announce the release of 9.
> >>
> >> Can we please *not* call it 9, but stick to 9.0?
> >
> > Another way to deal with this would be to make the next one 10, the
> > following one 11, etc., etc. :)
>
> You mean we're not going to have PostgreSQL X? Ah, but then it might
> get shortened to PGX, and then we'd be in a kerfuffle. ;)
I see you have uncovered my dastardly plan to capture versions up to
49 for PGX(LIX). ;)
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com
iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
