Re: MMAP Buffers - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Radosław Smogura
Subject Re: MMAP Buffers
Date
Msg-id 201104172209.24587.rsmogura@softperience.eu
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: MMAP Buffers  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: MMAP Buffers
List pgsql-hackers
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> Sunday 17 April 2011 20:02:11
> On Sunday 17 April 2011 19:26:31 Radosław Smogura wrote:
> > Kernel merges vm_structs. So mappings are compacted. I'm not kernel
> > specialist, but skipping memory consumption, for not compacted mappings,
> > kernel uses btrees for dealing with  TLB, so it should not matter if
> > there is  100 vm_structs or 100000 vm_structs.
>
> But the CPUs TLB cache has maybe 16/256 (1lvl, 2nd) to 64/512 entries. That
> will mean that there will be cachemisses all over.
> Additionally your scheme requires flushing it regularly...
>
> Andres

I only know Phenom has 4096 entries I think and this covers 16MB of memory.
But I was taking about memory usage of struct vm_struct in kernel. I tries as
well with huge pages, but I can't write really fast allocator for this, it's
slower then malloc, maybe from different reasons.

Regards,
Radek


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: ALTER TABLE INHERIT vs collations
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: MMAP Buffers