Re: SSI non-serializable UPDATE performance - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dan Ports
Subject Re: SSI non-serializable UPDATE performance
Date
Msg-id 20110425033308.GJ57793@csail.mit.edu
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SSI non-serializalbe UPDATE performance (was: getting to beta)  ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>)
Responses Re: SSI non-serializable UPDATE performance
Re: SSI non-serializable UPDATE performance
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 08:54:31AM -0500, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Even though this didn't show any difference in Dan's performance
> tests, it seems like reasonable insurance against creating a new
> bottleneck in very high concurrency situations.
>
> Dan, do you have a patch for this, or should I create one?

Sure, patch is attached.

Dan

--
Dan R. K. Ports              MIT CSAIL                http://drkp.net/

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Daniel Farina
Date:
Subject: Re: fsync reliability
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Unlogged tables, persistent kind