Robert Haas wrote:
> > We can pick different options for 9.0, 9.1, and 9.2. ?(For PG 9.0
> > probably only #1 is appropriate.)
>
> I don't like any of these options as well as what I already proposed.
> I proposed a complicated approach that actually fixes the problem for
> real; you're proposing a whole bunch of simpler approaches all of
> which have pretty obvious holes. We already have something that only
> sorta works; replacing it with a different system that only sorta
> works is not going to be a great leap forward.
What is your proposal? Write a password into a file that is read by the
postmaster on startup and used for connections? That would remove the
"modify pg_hba.conf to 'trust'" step, but again only for new servers.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
