Re: JSON for PG 9.2 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: JSON for PG 9.2
Date
Msg-id 201112201926.33782.andres@anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: JSON for PG 9.2  (Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tuesday, December 20, 2011 07:23:43 PM Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
> "David E. Wheeler" <david@justatheory.com> writes:
> > holds: it is not a programming language, and one does not need a PL to
> > have a JSON data type.
> Exactly.  That does not contradict the fact that if you have
> pl/ecmascript you already have JSON.  And that we might as well have had
> the ecmascript PL for some time now, we just need to check about that.
Not really. You need to be able to "evaluate" json without it possibly 
executing code. Many js implementations are likely to have such a feature 
though.

Andres


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Page Checksums
Next
From: Claes Jakobsson
Date:
Subject: Re: JSON for PG 9.2