Re: pg_database_size differs from df -s - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Frank Lanitz
Subject Re: pg_database_size differs from df -s
Date
Msg-id 20120606214541.1721e9919873a0f17d1c5189@frank.uvena.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_database_size differs from df -s  (Alban Hertroys <haramrae@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: pg_database_size differs from df -s
List pgsql-general
On Wed, 6 Jun 2012 20:31:36 +0200
Alban Hertroys <haramrae@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 6 Jun 2012, at 16:33, Frank Lanitz wrote:
>
> > the result is much bigger than running a df -s over the postgres
> > folder
> > - Its about factor 5 to 10 depending on database.
>
>
> Is your du reporting sizes in Bytes or blocks or ...?

Should be byte as its a linux.

cheers,
Frank
--
Frank Lanitz <frank@frank.uvena.de>

Attachment

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Viktor Rosenfeld
Date:
Subject: Query runtime dependent on ANALYZE run
Next
From: "David Johnston"
Date:
Subject: Re: Renumber table rows