Re: A minor correction in comment in heaptuple.c - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: A minor correction in comment in heaptuple.c
Date
Msg-id 20140128171016.GI20898@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: A minor correction in comment in heaptuple.c  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: A minor correction in comment in heaptuple.c
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 11:20:39AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> > On 2014-01-28 11:14:49 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >> OK, so does anyone object to removing this comment line?
> 
> > Let's just not do anything. This is change for changes sake. Not
> > improving anything the slightest.
> 
> Indeed.  I'd actually request that you revert your previous change to the
> comment, as it didn't improve matters and is only likely to cause pain for
> future back-patching.

OK, so we have a don't change anything and a revert. I am thinking the
new wording as a super-minor improvement.  Anyone else want to vote?

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + Everyone has their own god. +



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: Performance Improvement by reducing WAL for Update Operation
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe