Re: test_shm_mq failing on anole (was: Sending out a request for more buildfarm animals?) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: test_shm_mq failing on anole (was: Sending out a request for more buildfarm animals?)
Date
Msg-id 20140929214434.GL5311@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: test_shm_mq failing on anole (was: Sending out a request for more buildfarm animals?)  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: test_shm_mq failing on anole (was: Sending out a request for more buildfarm animals?)
List pgsql-hackers
Andres Freund wrote:

> I'm generally baffled at all the stuff postmaster does in signal
> handlers... ProcessConfigFile(), load_hba() et al. It's all done with
> signals disabled, but still.

As far as I recall, the rationale for why this is acceptable is that the
whole of postmaster is run with signals blocked; they are only unblocked
during the sleeping select().

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT {UPDATE | IGNORE}
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: test_shm_mq failing on anole (was: Sending out a request for more buildfarm animals?)