Re: Freeze avoidance of very large table. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: Freeze avoidance of very large table.
Date
Msg-id 20150713122250.GA9518@awork2.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Freeze avoidance of very large table.  (Sawada Masahiko <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Freeze avoidance of very large table.
List pgsql-hackers
On 2015-07-13 21:03:07 +0900, Sawada Masahiko wrote:
> Even If we implement rewriting tool for vm into pg_upgrade, it will
> take time as much as revacuum because it need whole scanning table.

Why would it? Sure, you can only set allvisible and not the frozen bit,
but that's fine. That way the cost for freezing can be paid over time.

If we require terrabytes of data to be scanned, including possibly
rewriting large portions due to freezing, before index only scans work
and most vacuums act in a partial manner the migration to 9.6 will be a
major pain for our users.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Ildus Kurbangaliev
Date:
Subject: Re: RFC: replace pg_stat_activity.waiting with something more descriptive
Next
From: Sawada Masahiko
Date:
Subject: Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2