Laurent Laborde wrote:
> Friendly greetings !
>
> What's the status of parallel clusterdb please ?
> I'm having fun (and troubles) applying the vacuumdb patch to clusterdb.
>
> This thread also talk about unifying code for parallelizing clusterdb and
> reindex.
> Was anything done about it ? Because i can't see it and my work currently
> involve a lot of copy/pasting from vacuumdb to clusterdb :)
Honestly, I have to wonder whether there are really valid use cases for
clusterdb. Are you actually using it and want to see it improved, or is
this just an academical exercise?
> And no, (i'm pretty sure) i don't have the required postgresql knowledge to
> do this unification if it isn't done already.
You may or may not lack it *now*, but that doesn't mean you will
continue to lack it forever.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
