Re: Doubt about AccessExclusiveLock in ALTER TABLE .. SET ( .. ); - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: Doubt about AccessExclusiveLock in ALTER TABLE .. SET ( .. );
Date
Msg-id 20150731200012.GC2441@postgresql.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Doubt about AccessExclusiveLock in ALTER TABLE .. SET ( .. );  (Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Doubt about AccessExclusiveLock in ALTER TABLE .. SET ( .. );
List pgsql-hackers
Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:

> In this patch I didn't change all lockmode comparison places previous
> pointed by you, but I can change it maybe adding other method called
> LockModeIsValid(lockmode) to do the comparison "lockmode >= NoLock &&
> lockmode < MAX_LOCKMODES" used in many places.

I don't like this.  Is it possible to write these comparisons in terms
of what they conflict with?  I think there are two main cases in the
existing code:

1. "is this lock mode valid" (sounds reasonable)
2. "can this be acquired in hot standby" (not so much, but makes  sense.)

and now we have your third thing, "what is the strongest of these two
locks".  For instance, if you told me to choose between ShareLock and
ShareUpdateExclusiveLock I wouldn't know which one is strongest.  I
don't it's sensible to have the "lock mode compare" primitive honestly.
I don't have any great ideas to offer ATM sadly.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: brin index vacuum versus transaction snapshots
Next
From: Kevin Grittner
Date:
Subject: Re: brin index vacuum versus transaction snapshots