Fabien COELHO wrote:
Hi,
> *-21.patch does what you suggested above, some hidden awkwardness
> but much less that the previous one.
Yeah, I think this is much nicer, don't you agree?
However, this is still a bit broken -- you cannot return a stack
variable from process_file, because the stack goes away once the
function returns. You need to malloc it.
Also, you forgot to update the comments in process_file,
process_builtin, etc.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
