Re: Why doesn't my mail appear on the pgsql-announce list? - Mailing list pgsql-www
From | Stephen Frost |
---|---|
Subject | Re: Why doesn't my mail appear on the pgsql-announce list? |
Date | |
Msg-id | 20160425034839.GV10850@tamriel.snowman.net Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: Why doesn't my mail appear on the pgsql-announce list? ("Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com>) |
Responses |
Re: Why doesn't my mail appear on the pgsql-announce list?
|
List | pgsql-www |
Takayuki, * Tsunakawa, Takayuki (tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com) wrote: > > The moderators have not approved it because it does not fall under any of > > the defined categories for acceptable mail to -announce. The -announce > > policy is here: > > > > https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/NewsEventsApproval > > I didn't notice this page. Thanks. > (But my mail seems to fall under " Major new advocacy effort"...) That's under "PostgreSQL Core News". My understanding of that section is that it's for generally agreed to news from the core PostgreSQL community (which seems appropriate, given the rest of the items listed). In other words, were this discussed ahead of time on -advocacy, a consensus among the individuals on -advocacy reached, the survey put up postgresql.org, and just generally done through the community, then it would fall under that category. A posting of a survey from an independent organization doesn't fall under the "PostgreSQL Core News" category, as I read the policy. Consider what could happen if we were to allow this survey- we would be saying that we will allow surveys from more-or-less any organization to be posted to -announce. I don't think that's a very good policy to have. > > If you wish to have an exception made to that policy, then I believe it > > needs to come from -core. > > I'm OK as I could post to pgsql-advocacy successfully. There is not a specific policy for -advocacy, as far as I'm aware. I would point out that we do try to keep all of the lists on-topic, as a general rule. Your posting of this survey to -advocacy for discussion seems entirely appropriate to me. > > Note that postgresql.org already has the ability to host surveys and for > > users to respond to those surveys. > > Yes, actually, I wanted to post the survey on postgresql.org, but I didn't know how. In addition, it seemed that postgresql.orgsurvey can contain only a single question. My survey requires three questions. What's more, the survey formneeds to allow respondents to add new choices to the multiple-choice question, and the second question needs to changebased on the first one. Those requirements made me choose Google Form and write some Google App Script. I would suggest that you bring that up on -www as a feature request then, there may be others who are interested. Of course, I'm sure that a patch to add such capability would go that much farther. The source code for the website is available here: http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=pgweb.git;a=summary Note that the website is currently undergoing a redesign of the front-end, so those pieces are likely to change in the near future. The backend code is also being upgraded to Django 1.8. I don't know if that would present a problem or not for adding the capabilities you're asking for. Asking on -www is probably the right approach before you start implementing any changes to that code. Thanks! Stephen