Re: [HACKERS] asynchronous execution - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI |
---|---|
Subject | Re: [HACKERS] asynchronous execution |
Date | |
Msg-id | 20170131.124548.85146517.horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: [HACKERS] asynchronous execution (Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>) |
Responses |
Re: [HACKERS] asynchronous execution
Re: [HACKERS] asynchronous execution Re: [HACKERS] asynchronous execution |
List | pgsql-hackers |
I noticed that this patch is conflicting with 665d1fa (Logical replication) so I rebased this. Only executor/Makefile conflicted. At Mon, 31 Oct 2016 10:39:12 +0900 (JST), Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote in <20161031.103912.217430542.horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp> > This a PoC patch of asynchronous execution feature, based on a > executor infrastructure Robert proposed. These patches are > rebased on the current master. > > 0001-robert-s-2nd-framework.patch > > Roberts executor async infrastructure. Async-driver nodes > register its async-capable children and sync and data transfer > are done out of band of ordinary ExecProcNode channel. So async > execution no longer disturbs async-unaware node and slows them > down. > > 0002-Fix-some-bugs.patch > > Some fixes for 0001 to work. This is just to preserve the shape > of 0001 patch. > > 0003-Modify-async-execution-infrastructure.patch > > The original infrastructure doesn't work when multiple foreign > tables is on the same connection. This makes it work. > > 0004-Make-postgres_fdw-async-capable.patch > > Makes postgres_fdw to work asynchronously. > > 0005-Use-resource-owner-to-prevent-wait-event-set-from-le.patch > > This addresses a problem pointed by Robers about 0001 patch, > that WaitEventSet used for async execution can leak by errors. > > 0006-Apply-unlikely-to-suggest-synchronous-route-of-ExecA.patch > > ExecAppend gets a bit slower by penalties of misprediction of > branches. This fixes it by using unlikely() macro. > > 0007-Add-instrumentation-to-async-execution.patch > > As the description above for 0001, async infrastructure conveys > tuples outside ExecProcNode channel so EXPLAIN ANALYZE requires > special treat to show sane results. This patch tries that. > > > A result of a performance measurement is in this message. > > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20161025.182150.230901487.horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp > > > | t0 - SELECT sum(a) FROM <local single table>; > | pl - SELECT sum(a) FROM <4 local children>; > | pf0 - SELECT sum(a) FROM <4 foreign children on single connection>; > | pf1 - SELECT sum(a) FROM <4 foreign children on dedicate connections>; > ... > | async > | t0: 3885.84 ( 40.20) 0.86% faster (should be error but stable on my env..) > | pl: 1617.20 ( 3.51) 1.26% faster (ditto) > | pf0: 6680.95 (478.72) 19.5% faster > | pf1: 1886.87 ( 36.25) 77.1% faster regards, -- Kyotaro Horiguchi NTT Open Source Software Center
pgsql-hackers by date: