Re: [HACKERS] increasing the default WAL segment size - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: [HACKERS] increasing the default WAL segment size
Date
Msg-id 20170216015451.qao2h5dhgmfqseqd@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] increasing the default WAL segment size  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] increasing the default WAL segment size
List pgsql-hackers
On 2017-02-15 22:46:38 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Now that we've renamed "xlog" to "wal" in user-facing elements, I think
> we should strive to use the name "wal" internally too in new code, not
> "xlog" anymore.  This patch introduces several variables, macros,
> functions that ought to change names now -- XLogSegmentOffset should be
> WALSegmentOffset for example.  (I expect that as we touch code over
> time, the use of "xlog" will decrease, though not fully disappear).

I think this will just decrease the consistency in xlog.c (note the
name) et al.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] increasing the default WAL segment size
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [Bug fix] PQsendQuery occurs error whentarget_session_attrs is set to read-write