On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 06:48:08PM +0000, Cristiano Coelho wrote:
> Hello all, this is related to postgres 9.6 (9.6.4) and a good description can be found here
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/46966360/postgres-word-similarity-not-comparing-words
>
> But in summary, word_similarity doesn’t seem to do exactly what the docs say, since it will match trigrams from
multiplewords rather tan doing a word by word comparison.
>
> Below is a table with output and expected output, thanks to kiln from stackoverflow to provide it.
>
Interesting. An klin's answer from stackoverflow.com is right.
The initial example can be reduced to the next:
=# select word_similarity('sage', 'age sag');word_similarity
----------------- 1
It computes maximum similarity using closest trigrams not considering order of
'sage' trigrams. It determines that all
trigrams from 'sage' match trigrams from 'age sag'.
Initial order of 'age sag' trigrams:
' a', ' ag', 'age', 'ge ', ' s', ' sa', 'sag', 'ag ' ^ ^ |from
|to
Sorted 'sage' trigrams (all of them occured within 'age sag' trigrams
continuously):
' s', ' sa', 'age', 'ge ', 'sag'
Maybe the problem should be solved by considering 'sage' trigrams
initial order.
--
Arthur Zakirov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
Russian Postgres Company
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
