Re: [HACKERS] Secondary index access optimizations - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Secondary index access optimizations
Date
Msg-id 20171204164437.lqjpeawybmrg7lw6@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Secondary index access optimizations  (Konstantin Knizhnik <k.knizhnik@postgrespro.ru>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Secondary index access optimizations
List pgsql-hackers
Konstantin Knizhnik wrote:
> 
> 
> On 30.11.2017 05:16, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 10:13 PM, Konstantin Knizhnik
> > <k.knizhnik@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
> > > Concerning broken partition_join test: it is "expected" failure: my patch
> > > removes from the plans redundant checks.
> > > So the only required action is to update expected file with results.
> > > Attached please find updated patch.
> > The last patch version has conflicts in regression tests and did not
> > get any reviews. Please provide a rebased version. I am moving the
> > patch to next CF with waiting on author as status. Thanks!
> 
> Rebased patch is attached.

I don't think this is a rebase on the previously posted patch ... it's
about 10x as big and appears to be a thorough rewrite of the entire
optimizer.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Chapman Flack
Date:
Subject: Signals in a BGW
Next
From: Marco Pfatschbacher
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: Keep one postmaster monitoring pipe per process