Reorganizing PG lists - Mailing list pgsql-www
From | Stephen Frost |
---|---|
Subject | Reorganizing PG lists |
Date | |
Msg-id | 20180103184300.GW2416@tamriel.snowman.net Whole thread Raw |
Responses |
Re: Reorganizing PG lists
Re: Reorganizing PG lists Re: Reorganizing PG lists |
List | pgsql-www |
Greetings, The migration of the active mailing lists from mj2 to PGLister has largely been completed and a few things from that have come to light regarding the current organization of the lists. Today we have these categories: User Lists Developer Lists Regional Lists Associations User Groups Project Lists Inactive Lists Reviewing actual usage shows that a number of the lists aren't really categorized correctly under these categories. In particular, the "Regional" lists are actually more "per-language" lists than they are "Regional" in nature. To address that, we're planning to create a new category called "Per Language Lists" (better name suggestions are welcome) and move a number of the currently "regional" lists to that category. Individuals who are familiar with the various non-English lists are solicited to please help us distinguish the lists that are truely "Regional" from those which are really "Per-Language". My understanding is that, at least, the following lists are really per-language and not really regional: pgsql-es-ayuda pgsql-es-fomento pgsql-es-trabajos pgsql-fr-generale pgsql-de-allgemein While the following lists are really "Regional" lists and not really "PUGS" and therefore they should be recategorized accordingly: arpug ecpug Lastly there is the "User Groups" category which, given the above moves, are all essentially defunct lists that are, at most, used just as a cross-post from Meetup.com and other services. We've actually been actively told by individuals who are involved in running PUGs in a number of places that the PG lists for them should be retired. What we've seen is that the per-language and regional lists are good to have but the PUGs are organized through other means and the lists end up being unused, which is worse than simply not having those lists because individuals looking for active user groups are misled into thinking that there isn't an active user group because there's no activity on the list. We also have the explicit "Local User Groups" portion of the website (which will be independently cleaned up to remove actually inactive groups and dead links). Please let me know if there are other lists which should really be categorized as "per-language" (honestly, I'm tempted to say that *all* of the currently "Regional" ones should be per-language...). I will also continue to reach out to individuals who are active on those lists for their advice as well. If any of the user groups are really active and have only the mailing list as a mechansim for communication (which, given that almost all of them haven't seen traffic in over a year and those that have nearly always have a meetup.com link...), please let me know and we can discuss what can be done to address that. I'm hoping to implement these changes in the next week to allow us to finally move completely off of mj2. Thanks! Stephen