Re: The buildfarm is in a pretty bad way, folks - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: The buildfarm is in a pretty bad way, folks
Date
Msg-id 20180406210234.ebt7tqpkwpem7z7w@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to The buildfarm is in a pretty bad way, folks  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: The buildfarm is in a pretty bad way, folks
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On 2018-04-06 16:59:11 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> It sure looks like there's been a frantic push to commit stuff that
> maybe wasn't quite fully baked.  I'm not terribly on board with that,
> because it's likely to be hard to disentangle who broke what.
> But in particular, it's clear that partition_prune and
> isolation/checksum_cancel are showing big problems.

While I'm obviously also unhappy about the frantic push to push semi
baked stuff, I'm not sure the two issues you point to above are that
good examples of carelessness. At least the latter seems mostly a pretty
normal portability thing around orderedness?

Greetings,

Andres Freund


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: The buildfarm is in a pretty bad way, folks
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning