On Sat, Apr 07, 2018 at 09:25:44AM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> I've always felt that the pg_foo_fn.h business was a kluge, and would
>> be happy to get rid of it. But one could also argue that it would be
>> a good design, if we adopted it uniformly instead of haphazardly.
>> But that'd require more code churn, and there's no longer a lot to be
>> gained thereby.
>
> I vote for removing pg_foo_fn.h.
+1 on that.
--
Michael
