On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 05:14:33PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> JDBC has its own set of options with targetServerType: master, slave,
> secondary, preferSlave and preferSecondary. What's proposed here is
> preferSlave and what we would miss is slave at the end.
So thinking a couple of extra minutes on this one, I am wondering if it
would be better to close completely the gap with two patches:
1) Get "read-only" done first, which uses most of the existing
infrastructure. That seems simple enough.
2) Get "prefer-read" and "prefer-write", which need some new
infrastructure to track the last preferred connection depending on what
the client wants.
--
Michael
