Re: BUG #16497: old and new pg_controldata WAL segment sizes areinvalid or do not match - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: BUG #16497: old and new pg_controldata WAL segment sizes areinvalid or do not match
Date
Msg-id 20200619004855.GA453547@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BUG #16497: old and new pg_controldata WAL segment sizes areinvalid or do not match  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: BUG #16497: old and new pg_controldata WAL segment sizes areinvalid or do not match
List pgsql-bugs
On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 02:29:43PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 02:11:14PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
>> I do think the doc could probably say replica 'or higher'.

+1.  Sounds good to me to just use "or higher" here.  The docs insist
on the concept of hierarchy for values of wal_level.

> OK, I will work on that, thanks.

Thanks.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: Problems at columns
Next
From: PG Bug reporting form
Date:
Subject: BUG #16504: Wrapping query in EXISTS() causes sequential scans of tables