Re: BUG #16605: PostgreSQL recovery startup process waiting and blocking to application queries - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

At Wed, 02 Sep 2020 10:58:49 +0000, PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org> wrote in 
> The following bug has been logged on the website:
> 
> Bug reference:      16605
> Logged by:          Tushar Takate
> Email address:      tushar11.takate@gmail.com
> PostgreSQL version: 10.5
> Operating system:   OEL 6.9
> Description:        
> 
> Hi Team ,
> 
> Problem/bug/issues statement : -  PostgreSQL recovery startup process is
> blocking the application queries .
> 
> Env Details - 
> 
> PostgtreSQL community version - 10.5
> OS - OEL 6.9 
> Replication type - Streaming - async 
> 
> DB parameters at replica side - 
> 
> max_standby_streaming_delay = -1
> max_standby_archive_delay = -1
> hot_standby_feedback = off
> 
> Startup process by ps -ef  
> 
> postgres           24489 24487  0  2019 ?        1-20:23:35 postgres:
> startup process   recovering 00000006000021D4000000ED waiting

This is the cause of all succeeding blocking chain. "recovering xxx
waiting" means the process is waiting for a recovery-conflict to be
resolved. In other words, the startup process is being blocked by some
backend. In your case the startup process should have taken
AccessExclusiveLock on the relation 17280 before being blocked. With
the setting max_standby_streaming_delay -1, the tartup process waits
forever.

The most common cause of recovery-conflict when "hot_standby_feedback
= off" is snapshot conflict. In other words, vacuum on the primary
side cannot be replayed on the standby since some transaction on the
standby side may refer to-be-vacuumed table rows.

I'm not sure about easier way but the cause can be examined by the
following steps.

=# select sent_lsn, replay_lsn, file, upper(to_hex(off)) from pg_stat_replication, lateral
pg_walfile_name_offset(replay_lsn)as o(file, off);
 
 sent_lsn  | replay_lsn |           file           | to_hex 
-----------+------------+--------------------------+--------
 0/5882B30 | 0/5874878  | 000000010000000000000005 | 874878

You will see that the replay_lsn is behind sent_lsn. and the last two
columns show the location of the blocked record.

$ pg_waldump .../000000010000000000000005 | grep 874878
rmgr: Heap2       len (rec/tot):    506/   506, tx:          0, lsn: 0/05874878, prev 0/05874850, desc: CLEAN remxid
600,blkref #0: rel 1663/12348/16385 blk 0
 

The Heap2-CLEAN is emitted by vacuum. You can avoid this kind of
conflict by turning hot_standby_feedback on and/or preferably setting
max_standby_streaming_delay to an effective value breaks any kind of
conflicts by terminating conflicting backends.  As a workaround after
snapshot-conflict happens, manually terminate backends with
backend_xmin <= 600, then startup will continue recovery.

Another common cause is another access exclusive lock that is blocked
by standby transaction.  In this case you will see Standby-LOCK as the
problem WAL record but pg_locks also shows such lock conflicts.

I think other kinds of recovery-conflicts rarely happens.

> All are the pid which are in wait queue are executing the select queries on
> same table that is (mytable) .
> 
> Can you please help us to understand the issues and possible
> solution/workaround/fix for it .
> 
> For temp fix we have restarted the DB service ( Before that we have tried to
> kill the process by -15 flag which not worked )

-- 
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center