Re: PG vs LLVM 12 on seawasp, next round - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: PG vs LLVM 12 on seawasp, next round
Date
Msg-id 20201208033819.ihahxgoklqsywseu@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PG vs LLVM 12 on seawasp, next round  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: PG vs LLVM 12 on seawasp, next round
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On 2020-12-01 12:08:10 -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2020-12-01 21:04:44 +0100, Fabien COELHO wrote:
> > Andres investigated a few days ago, managed to reproduce the issue locally,
> > and has one line patch. I'm unsure if it should be prevently back-patched,
> > though.
> 
> I see no reason not to backpatch - it's more correct for past versions
> of LLVM as well.

I pushed that now.

- Andres



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: vac_update_datfrozenxid will raise "wrong tuple length" if pg_database tuple contains toast attribute.
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: upcoming API changes for LLVM 12