Re: Non-reproducible valgrind failure on HEAD - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: Non-reproducible valgrind failure on HEAD
Date
Msg-id 20210509211750.oavevzhghzm77och@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Non-reproducible valgrind failure on HEAD  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Non-reproducible valgrind failure on HEAD
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On 2021-05-09 17:12:14 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> (I wonder if we shouldn't adjust the comments in pg_config_manual.h,
> though, as they certainly leave the impression that USE_VALGRIND
> isn't essential.)

That'd make sense to me. If we found a better way to deal with the
sinval thing it'd be good too - but I am not seeing anything convincing,
and I looked a couple times over the years...



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Non-reproducible valgrind failure on HEAD
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Non-reproducible valgrind failure on HEAD