Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum
Date
Msg-id 20220213020255.vjcamllo47xo2w4e@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum  (Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On 2022-02-11 13:47:01 +0100, Matthias van de Meent wrote:
> Today I noticed the inefficiencies of our dead tuple storage once
> again, and started theorizing about a better storage method; which is
> when I remembered that this thread exists, and that this thread
> already has amazing results.
> 
> Are there any plans to get the results of this thread from PoC to committable?

I'm not currently planning to work on it personally. It'd would be awesome if
somebody did...

Greetings,

Andres Freund



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints
Next
From: Joseph Koshakow
Date:
Subject: Re: Fix overflow in DecodeInterval