Re: Reconnect a single connection used by multiple threads in embedded SQL in C application causes error. - Mailing list pgsql-bugs
From | Noah Misch |
---|---|
Subject | Re: Reconnect a single connection used by multiple threads in embedded SQL in C application causes error. |
Date | |
Msg-id | 20220223050015.GC3838703@rfd.leadboat.com Whole thread Raw |
In response to | RE: Reconnect a single connection used by multiple threads in embedded SQL in C application causes error. ("egashira.yusuke@fujitsu.com" <egashira.yusuke@fujitsu.com>) |
Responses |
RE: Reconnect a single connection used by multiple threads in embedded SQL in C application causes error.
|
List | pgsql-bugs |
On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 12:06:23PM +0000, egashira.yusuke@fujitsu.com wrote: > > > And, is there limitation that we can't CONNECT or DISCONNECT the DEFAULT connection inside a thread in multithreadedapplication? > > > > For now, yes. This is a bug. The documentation you quoted is out of date > > with respect to the code. That documentation comes from commit 8f61184 > > (2003-12). The behavior of connections shared across threads changed in > > commit 757fb0e (2004-03). Since that change, there's a per-thread record of > > the default connection, in addition to a global notion of the default > > connection. I suspect a few use cases work well today: > > > > - One thread does all the CONNECT and DISCONNECT commands. Other threads just > > use the default connection, with mutual exclusion. > > - Each thread does its own CONNECT, DISCONNECT, and other commands. Each > > thread has its own default connection. No sharing at all. > > The documentation from commit 8f61184 seems to have been updated by the commit 0f33ee0 (2017-06). > However, there is still lacking of information about the DEFAULT connection on per-thread, I understood. Yes. > > Your example does the CONNECT to establish the default connection in one > > thread, and it does the DISCONNECT of the default connection in another > > thread. That's buggy today. > > > > Another behavior that may qualify as a bug: ECPGsetconn() updates only the > > thread-specific connection, while ECPGconnect() updates both the > > thread-specific and global connections. > > I also understood that my example is impossible by the implementation bugs. > > I think it would take some time to fix these bugs. Yes. I suspect the hard part will be picking a specification that makes your case work better without breaking other important cases that work today. > If it takes long time to fix it, will this limitation(*) be added to the documentation? > > [*] Based on your explanation: > "If we use the default connection inside a thread in multithreaded application, > CONNECT and DISCONNECT commands are allowed only following cases. > - One thread does all the CONNECT and DISCONNECT commands. > Other threads just use the default connection, with mutual exclusion. > - Each thread does its own CONNECT, DISCONNECT, and other commands. > Each thread has its own default connection. No sharing at all." Would you like to propose a patch? > An additional report: > I also ran my reproduction application built with rh-postgresql12 libraries (installed from Red Hat Software Collections), > and it crashed instead of an error in step 5 in my first email. > > * Actually, the error message in my first email came from postgresql built by myself (./configure --prefix=xxx). > > The backtrace is following. > (gdb) bt > #0 0x00007fa11a4ddd0f in ecpg_find_prepared_statement () from /opt/rh/rh-postgresql12/root/usr//lib64/libecpg.so.rh-postgresql12-6 > #1 0x00007fa11a4de11b in ecpg_prepared () from /opt/rh/rh-postgresql12/root/usr//lib64/libecpg.so.rh-postgresql12-6 > #2 0x00007fa11a4d8b65 in ecpg_do_prologue () from /opt/rh/rh-postgresql12/root/usr//lib64/libecpg.so.rh-postgresql12-6 > #3 0x00007fa11a4d8c33 in ecpg_do () from /opt/rh/rh-postgresql12/root/usr//lib64/libecpg.so.rh-postgresql12-6 > #4 0x00007fa11a4d8d5b in ECPGdo () from /opt/rh/rh-postgresql12/root/usr//lib64/libecpg.so.rh-postgresql12-6 > #5 0x0000000000401143 in thread_main2 () > #6 0x00007fa11a2bdea5 in start_thread () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0 > #7 0x00007fa119fe68cd in clone () from /lib64/libc.so.6 > > I think this happened because the PGconn referenced by Thread#1 was destroyed in step 4 and then overwritten with invaliddata. That makes sense.
pgsql-bugs by date: